Anita Ankush Shingan v. Ankush Ashok Shingan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1055 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 227 OF 2019 ANITA ANKUSH SHINGAN

VERSUS

ANKUSH ASHOK SHINGAN ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Rakesh Brahmankar h/f. Mr. Bhosale Mahesh S.

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sachin S. Randive ...

CORAM

: SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 06th DECEMBER, 2023 PER COURT :

1.

Heard the learned counsel for for both the sides finally. 2.

By way of this application, the applicant is seeking transfer of the proceedings of dissolution of marriage filed before the learned 5th Family Court, Mumbai at Bandra to learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Shrigonda, District Ahmednagar.

3.

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that it is not possible for the applicant to attend the proceedings by travelling from Shrigonda to Bandra.

4.

The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the application is frivolous. The applicant is able bodied person and is in a position to attend the proceedings at Bandra. She has suppressed material facts. The conduct of the applicant was objectionable. No discretion can be exercised in her favour.

5.

I have considered rival submissions. I record following findings :

i.

It is inconvenient for the applicant to travel and attend the proceedings at Bandra.

ii.

She has one child out of wedlock.

iii.

She has no source of income and she is staying with her parents. iv.

Her sufferings and hardship are apparent.

v.

There is nothing on record to show that the respondent is unable to attend the proceedings by travelling from Bandra to Shrigonda. 6.

A useful reference can be made to the law laid down by the Supreme Court and this Court in the following matters : a) Sumita Singh Versus Kumar Sanjay, 2002 AIR (SC) 396 ; b) Soma Choudhury Versus Gourab Choudhaury, (2004) 13 Supreme Court Cases 462 ;

c) Sangamitra Ramakant Royalwar Versus Ramakant Gangaram Royalwar, 2009 (1) Mh.L.J. 303 ;

d) Anita Balkrishna Barge Versus Balkrishna Sopan Barge, 2011 (1) Mh.L.J. 518 ;

e) Mahadevi Gopal Mehetre Versus Gopal Prabhakar Mehetre, 2016

(4) All.M.R. 599 ;

f) Vaishali Shridhar Jagtap Versus Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap, 2016 AIR (SC) 3584 ;

g) Pooja Rohan Jadhav Vresus Rohan Ramesh Jadhav, order passed by High Court, Bench at Aurangabad in MCA No. 171 of 2018 ; h) Ashwini Kailas Patil Versus Shivajirao Anandrao Gaekwar, order passed by High Court, Bench at Aurangabad in MCA No. 46 of 2020.

7.

For the reasons stated above, I pass following order :

ORDER

i.

The Miscellaneous Civil Application is allowed. ii.

The Petition-A No. 1314 of 2017 pending before the learned 5th Family Court Mumbai at Bandra, shall stand transferred to learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Shrigonda, District Ahmednagar.

iii.

An endeavour be made to decide the proceedings finally as expeditiously as possible.

iv.

The concern Court shall transmit the papers immediately.

v.

The parties to appear before the Court at Aurangabad on 05th January, 2024.

vi.

All the proceedings pending at a place where the applicant is residing be preferably posted on same date. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ] Thakur-Chauhan/-