← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPLN/2773/2021application allowed

Ashok Jaynarayan Sharma And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2021-12-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More3 pages

{1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2768 OF 2021 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 660 OF 2021 Sangita w/o Niraj Joshi & others Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Mr. G. D. Jain, advocate for the applicants Mr. R. D. Sanap, APP for Respondent No.1.

Mr. A. B. Kale and Mr. A.J.Patil, advocates for Respondent No.2. AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2773 OF 2021 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 659 OF 2021 Ashok Jaynarayan Sharma & others Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Mr. G. D. Jain, advocate for the applicants Mr. R. D. Sanap, APP for Respondent No.1.

Mr. A. B. Kale and Mr. A.J.Patil, advocates for Respondent No.2. CORAM : V. K. JADHAV AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATE : 09th December, 2021.

PC :

Heard.

It appears that during pendency of Criminal

{2} Applications No. 660 of 2021 and 659 of 2021, charge sheet came to be submitted.

By these two applications, the applicants are seeking quashing of the proceedings by carrying out amendment in the prayer clause.

In view of the above and for the reasons stated in the applications, Criminal Applications seeking amendment are allowed in terms of prayer clause "B", respectively. Both the Criminal Applications are disposed of accordingly.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (V. K. JADHAV) JUDGE JUDGE adb

{3}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 660 OF 2021 Sangita w/o Niraj Joshi & others Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Mr. G. D. Jain, advocate for the applicants Mr. R. D. Sanap, APP for Respondent No.1.

Mr. A. B. Kale and Mr. A.J.Patil, advocates for Respondent No.2. AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 659 OF 2021 Ashok Jaynarayan Sharma & others Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Mr. G. D. Jain, advocate for the applicants Mr. R. D. Sanap, APP for Respondent No.1.

Mr. A. B. Kale and Mr. A.J.Patil, advocates for Respondent No.2. CORAM : V. K. JADHAV AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATE : 09th December, 2021.

PC :

Learned Counsel for the applicants submits that copy of the charge sheet is already fled on record in one application. Stand over to 19th January, 2022 for hearing. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (V. K. JADHAV) JUDGE JUDGE adb