Vasant Sheshrao Sonawane v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Collector, Aurangabad And ORS
1 1089 to 1091 ca 15889-22+
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1089 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.15889 OF 2022 IN FAST/28814/2022 KACHRU S/O SHESHRAO SONAWANE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. T. C. Sonawane Tejas Charudatt AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr. S. N. Kendre ...
AND 1090 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.15891 OF 2022 IN FAST/28835/2022 VASANT SHESHRAO SONAWANE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. T. C. Sonawane Tejas Charudatt AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr. A. B. Chate ...
AND 1091 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16407 OF 2022 IN FAST/28850/2022 SHIVAJI SHESHRAO SONAWANE AND ANR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. T. C. Sonawane Tejas Charudatt AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr. B. V. Virdhe ....
2 1089 to 1091 ca 15889-22+ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATED : 31/01/2023.
P. C. :
1.
Heard rival submissions.
2.
The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods, which appear to be caused due to their poor financial condition. The learned AGP strongly opposed the applications on the ground that delay is not properly explained.
3.
Considering the statutory right of the applicants, the applications are allowed and the delay periods in all these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the periods of aforesaid delay.
4.
The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.
5.
The applications are accordingly disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-