Karbhari Chagan Bhusare v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2024:BHC-AUG:3035 (1) 53-ca-4301-2020.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4301 OF 2020 IN FAST/30710/2018 KARBHARI CHAGAN BHUSARE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Mr. Abhishek M. Hajare, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. N. S. Tekale, AGP for Respondent No.1.

...

CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

DATED : 12th FEBRUARY, 2024.

PER COURT:- 1.

Heard.

2.

The learned advocate appearing for the applicant would submit that in connected cases, the applications seeking delay condonation are allowed by this Court. He placed on record the copy of order passed in Civil Application No.2168 of 2020 in First Appeal Stamp No.34515 of 2018. He would submit that the similar order may be passed in the present application. He would further urge that the delay caused in filing the appeal is duly explained.

3.

The learned AGP opposes the application. However, he does not dispute that in connected matters arising out of same land acquisition proceedings similar delay has been condoned. 4.

Having heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, it can be observed that the similarly situated applicants are extended benefit of delay condonation in the respective appeals subject to condition that the applicants would

(2) 53-ca-4301-2020.odt not be entitled to claim the interest on the enhanced amount of compensation if their appeals are allowed.

5.

The civil application is allowed in aforesaid terms. 6.

The delay caused in filing the first appeal is condoned. 7.

The appeal be registered.

(S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR) JUDGE Devendra/February-2024