Satyawan Hanmant Yedale v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

W.P. No.11273/16

IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11273 OF 2016 1.

Satyawan s/o. Hanmant Yedale, Age 53 years, Occu. Agri., R/o. Gharni, Tq. Chakur, Dist. Latur.

....Petitioner.

Versus

1.

The State of Maharashtra Through Collector, Latur, Tq. & Dist. Latur.

2.

The Executive Engineer, Latur Medium Project, Latur, Tq. & Dist. Latur.

....Respondents.

Mr. V.G. Kodale, Advocate for petitioner.

Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for respondent No. 1.

CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATED : February 14, 2017.

ORAL JUDGMENT :

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, heard both the sides for final disposal. 2.

The proceeding is filed for giving direction to the respondents to decide the

W.P. No.11273/16 application filed under section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act before the Special Land Acquisition Officer on the basis of common judgment delivered by the Reference Court. It is contended that when the application was given on 24.9.2014, the proceeding is not yet decided. 3.

In view of this circumstance, direction is given to the respondents to decide the matter within three months from the date of receipt of this order.

In those terms, rule is made absolute.

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [T.V. NALAWADE, J.] ssc/