← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/15741/2022admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Baliram Mansaram Sapkal v. Piran Vitthal Gawali And ORS.

2024-07-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More1 pages

(1) 16 CA-15741-22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 16 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15741 OF 2022 IN SAST/28909/2022 BALIRAM MANSARAM SAPKAL

VERSUS

PIRAN VITTHAL GAWALI AND ORS.

.....

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ingle Kachru A.

.....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 01-07-2024 ORDER:- 1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

2.

The learned counsel Mr. S.G. Gaike and learned counsel Mr. N.R. Thorat for respondent No. 2 and 3, despite appearance, remained absent. Other respondents are also served, but they remained absent.

3.

Under this application, the applicant is seeking condonation of delay of only 38 days in filing Second Appeal. 4.

There is no oppose to the application.

5. Considering the short period of delay, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and disposed of. Second Appeal be registered after removal of office objections, if any. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.)