← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/12344/2017disposed offdismissed for default

The Ex. Engineer, Minor Irrigation Pwd Div. Osmanabad And ANR v. Rameshwar Krishna Todkari And ANR

2019-11-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil1 pages

23.1.CA.12344.17.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 23.1 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12344 OF 2017 IN FAST/31735/2017 THE EX. ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION PWD DIV. OSMANABAD AND ANR

VERSUS

RAMESHWAR KRISHNA TODKARI AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicant no.1 : Mr. Karlekar Sujeet G. AGP for applicant no. 2: Mr. R.B. Bagul Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 : Mr. L.C. Patil ...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : .14.11.2019 PER COURT :

Heard both the sides. There is a delay of 1450 days in preferring the appeal by the acquiring body challenging the judgment and order passed by the reference court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act.

2.

True it is that the delay is enormous, however, considering the grounds mentioned in the application and taking into account the fact that even the claimants are impugning the same judgment and award, the delay is condoned.

(MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) habeeb 1/1