Umesh Mahadev Zhunurute @ Zhinjurute v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another
2025:BHC-AUG:6206
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 53 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO.1694 OF 2024 UMESH MAHADEV ZHUNURUTE @ ZHINJURUTE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr.P.P.More APP for Respondent-State : Mr.B.B.Bhise ...
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE : 03.03.2025 P.C. :
1] Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.
2] The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 506/2024, registered with Gandhi Chowk Police Station, Latur, for the offence punishable under Section 109 (1), 115, 3 (5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3] This Court, by order dated 07.10.2024, has granted interim protection in favour of the applicant for the submissions stated in para no.3, as noted below : 3.
Learned counsel for applicant submits that the name of applicant is not reflected in the first information report though the informant has specifically stated the manner in which he was assaulted by the other accused
persons. It is his solemn statement that there is no criminal history against the applicant. 4] The learned counsel for the applicant submits that in pursuance of the aforesaid order, the applicant has attended the concerned police station and has co-operated with the investigation.
5] Considering that nothing is to be recovered from the applicant, so also, investigation in the matter is complete and charge sheet is filed, the interim protection granted by this Court by order dated 07.10.2024 stands confirmed, in the following terms :
i] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. He shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.
ii] The applicant shall co-operate with the proceedings before the trial Court.
6] In the event, the applicant violates any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be cancelled.
7] It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present
anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.
8] The application stands disposed of.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC