The Ex. Engineer, Waghur Project Jalgaon And ORS v. Hemant Namdeo Shimpi
{1} CA 11741 OF 2019 & ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 59 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11741 OF 2019 IN FAST/30145/2019 THE EX. ENGINEER, WAGHUR DAM DIVISION, JALGAON AND ORS
VERSUS
BHAUSAHEB BALIRAM PATIL ...
WITH CA/11743/2019 IN FAST/30149/2019 WITH CA/11745/2019 IN FAST/30228/2019 WITH CA/11747/2019 IN FAST/30231/2019 WITH CA/11749/2019 IN FAST/30225/2019 WITH CA/11751/2019 IN FAST/30127/2019 WITH CA/11755/2019 IN FAST/30131/2019 WITH CA/11757/2019 IN FAST/30163/2019 WITH CA/11759/2019 IN FAST/30154/2019 WITH CA/11761/2019 IN FAST/30158/2019 WITH CA/11763/2019 IN FAST/30168/2019 ...
Advocate for Applicant-Acquiring Body : Mr.Suresh D.Dhongade AGP for Applicants-State Authorities : Mr.S.N.Morampalle ...
CORAM : K.K.SONAWANE, J.
DATE: 17th February, 2020 PER COURT:- 1.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant-Acquiring Body. Despite service of notice to the respondents-claimants, no one else appeared on their behalf. Learned AGP is present for the appellantsState Authorities. Perused the applications and relevant documents produced on record.
2.
The applicant-Acquiring Body moved the present applications for condonation of delay caused in fling the frst appeals against impugned Judgments and Awards passed by the learned Reference Court in Land Acquisition References fled under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. According to learned counsel for the applicantAcquiring Body, impugned Judgments and Awards passed by the Reference Court are erroneous, illegal and are not as per the provisions of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Applicant is Body corporate having its
{2} CA 11741 OF 2019 & ORS independent entity. After procuring the funds for court fees appeals came to be fled, however, there is delay in fling the appeals. According to learned counsel for applicant, delay so caused is not intentional or deliberate, but caused due to compliance of ofcial process.
3.
As referred above, the respondents-original claimants did not turn up to this Court even after service of notice. Therefore, no opportunity is received for hearing of the respondents-claimants in these matters.
4.
Considering the nature of the subject-matter and reasons mentioned in the applications, I do not fnd any impediment to allow the applications for condonation of delay. The public interest is involved into the matter. It is settled law that liberal and pragmatic approach is essential to be adopted by avoiding pedantic approach while dealing with the application for consideration of delay. Therefore, it is imperative to grant some sort of latitude to the applicant-Acquiring Body to present appeals by condoning the delay. It would not cause any prejudice or injustice to the respondents. In contrast, it would subserve the purpose of substantial justice. Hence, the applications for condonation of delay deserve to be allowed. In sequel, the applications stand allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). Delay caused in fling appeals against the impugned Judgments and Awards is hereby condoned. Registry to take requisite steps for registration of appeals. Civil applications stand disposed of accordingly. 5.
On registration of appeals, issue notice of admission of appeals to the respondents-claimants.
6. After compliance of procedural formalities, list the appeals for further process in due course.
( K.K.SONAWANE ) JUDGE SPT