Arjun Sayaji Chadidar v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Jalna And Others

(1) 33- CA-5394-2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 33 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5394 OF 2022 IN FAST/31034/2021 ARJUN SAYAJI CHADIDAR ....Applicant

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS .....Respondents .....

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. I. K. Wagh h/f Mr. K. M. More AGP for Responden tNos. 1 and 2 /State: Mr. Rajdeep R. Raut ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : MARCH 03, 2025 ORDER:- 1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 1891 days in filing the appeal, which appears to be caused due to his poor financial condition.

3.

The learned counsel for the respondent/Acquiring Body remained absent. The learned AGP is formal party, but strongly opposed the application on the ground that the delay is not properly explained and it is inordinate. 4.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicant and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is

(2) 33- CA-5394-2022.odt allowed and the delay of 1891 days in this application stands condoned subject to cost of Rs. 3000/- (Rupees Three thousand) to be deposited with the Registry of this Court for utilization of High Court Dispensary within two weeks and also subject to condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest and statutory benefit for the period of aforesaid delay. 5.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any, and deposit of cost.

6.

The application is accordingly disposed of .

7.

Call record and proceedings in the appeal.

---- (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) Y.S. Kulkarni