Shaikh Shafique Shaikh Gafoor v. Vandana Krishnan And Others
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1064 CONT. PETITION NO.264 OF 2017 IN WP/892/2016 WITH CP/265/2017 IN WP/894/2016 WITH CP/277/2017 IN WP/1455/2016 WITH CP/275/2017 IN WP/5112/2016 WITH CP/276/2017 IN WP/886/2016 WITH CP/631/2018 IN WP/5664/2016 WITH CP/270/2017 IN WP/888/2016 WITH CP/267/2017 IN WP/887/2016 WITH CP/163/2017 IN WP/3811/2015 WITH CP/271/2017 IN WP/896/2016 WITH CP/266/2017 IN WP/1454/2016 WITH CP/272/2017 IN WP/893/2016 WITH CP/273/2017 IN WP/890/2016 WITH CP/274/2017 IN WP/889/2016 WITH CP/268/2017 IN WP/891/2016 WITH CP/269/2017 IN WP/895/2016 TRUPTI SHIVAJI SARJINE
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS AND 1 CONT. PETITION NO.251 OF 2017 IN WP/4039/2016 WITH CP/114/2018 IN WP/1037/2016 WITH CP/113/2018 IN WP/1618/2016 WITH CP/254/2017 IN WP/4036/2016 WITH CP/250/2017 IN WP/4037/2016 WITH CP/256/2017 IN WP/4040/2016 WITH CP/745/2018 IN WP/1039/2016 WITH CP/115/2018 IN WP/1030/2016 WITH CP/746/2018 IN WP/1608/2016 AND CP/781/2018, CP/782/2018, CP/783/2018, CP/375/2020 Mr.H.I. Pathan, Mr.S.S. Kazi and Ms. Shabahat Kazi, Mr. M.N. Shaikh, Advocates for the petitioners.
Mr.S.G. Karlekar, AGP for the respondent/State.
CORAM
:
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.
DATED :
01.07.2022 PC :- 01.
We have considered our earlier orders. The learned AGP informs that the Secretary, School Education and Sports Department, Mantralaya,
( 2 ) Mumbai, Mr. Ranjit Singh Deol is present in the Court. An affidavit-in-reply dated 01.07.2022 has been filed, which we have considered. 02.
Keeping in view the order that we are passing, we need not advert to the entire details as regards the counter submissions of the litigating parties and the contentious issues.
03.
In view of the above, we record the statements made by the purported contemnor through the learned AGP and in the light of the affidavit, as under :- a) The petitioners would prepare their calculations as regards the arrears as well as the salary structures, within 15 days from today and submit the same to the Dy. Director of Education, Aurangabad.
b) The respondents/authorities shall collect similar data from other similarly situated petitioners/candidates, who have/have not approached the Court and the collection of such data would be completed by 30th September, 2022.
c) The respondents shall conduct the verification exercise by
( 3 ) comparing the data received from the candidates/petitioners and the data prepared by their own departments and thereafter confirm the records as regards the pay-scales of these candidates/ petitioners and the arrears of amount they have to be paid. This exercise will be concluded by 15th November, 2022. d) Pursuant to the above, the payment of the arrears would be commenced and would be concluded by 31st January, 2023. e) In those cases, which are undisputed as on date, the respondents agree to commence their regular monthly salary within 15 days.
f) Needless to state, after the above exercise is completed, if any of the petitioners or similarly situated candidate/s is/are aggrieved by the calculations and the amounts paid, they would be at liberty to avail of a remedy as may be permissible in law. 4.
In view of the above statements made to the Court, the Contempt Petitions stand disposed off.
[ANIL L. PANSARE,J.] [RAVINDRA V. GHUGE,J.] snk/2022/JUN22/cp264.17