Balaji Suresh Salunke v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector Osmanabad And Others

CA2719.2015.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2719 OF 2015 IN CRAST/30630/2014 BALAJI SURESH SALUNKE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA TROUGH COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND OTHERS .............

Mr V. V. Ingale, Advocate for the applicant Mr D. V. Tele, AGP for respondent/State ..............

ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3996 OF 2015 IN CRAST/6005/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4006 OF 2015 IN CRAST/6007/2014 CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.

DATE : 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2015.

PER COURT:

.

These are applications for condonation of delay. 2.

Heard. The averments made in the applications are not controverted by respondents. The applicants have shown bona fide by filing undertakings to the effect that, they would not claim any statutory benefits for the delayed period of 495 days.

3.

In light of the above, Civil Applications are allowed. Delay is condoned. Civil Applications accordingly stand disposed of. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] sgp