Bombay High CourtPIL/1/2014disposed offdismissed for default

Ramdas Ganpatrao Dapkekar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2015-12-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A. I. S. Cheema1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

913 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 1 OF 2014 RAMDAS GANPATRAO DAPKEKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mrs. Chate Sharada P. AGP for Respondents: Mr. V.M. Kagne Advocate for Respondents No.3, 4, 6 to 11: Mrs. Geeta Deshpande ...

CORAM : R. M. BORDE & A. I. S. CHEEMA, JJ.

Date: December 01, 2015 ...

PER COURT :- It would be open for the petitioner to tender an appropriate representation / complaint to the Chief Executive Officer or the Director of Education, pointing out the irregularities committed in the making construction of the structure for the schools. If the petitioner tenders representation/complaint to the aforesaid authorities, it would be open for those authorities to hold necessary enquiry and take appropriate action, if deemed necessary.

With liberty as aforesaid, PIL stands disposed of. ( A. I. S. CHEEMA, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. ) vbd