The State Of Maharashtra And ORS v. Patloba Pandurang Jaybaye

1 906-12255-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 906 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12255 OF 2019 IN FAST/30246/2019 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

VERSUS

BABU GANGADHAR KATE ...

Advocate for Applicants/State : Mr S.N. Morampalle Advocate for Respondent : Mr P.C. Mayure WITH 06 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12247 OF 2019 IN FAST/30059/2019 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

VERSUS

DINESH UDDHAV DHANGAR ...

Advocate for Applicants/State : Mr S.N. Morampalle Advocate for Respondent : Mr P.C. Mayure WITH 06 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12249 OF 2019 IN FAST/30253/2019 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

VERSUS

GANESH UDDHAV DHANGAR ...

Advocate for Applicants/State : Mr S.N. Morampalle Advocate for Respondent : Mr P.C. Mayure WITH 06 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12251 OF 2019 IN FAST/30250/2019 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

VERSUS

2 906-12255-2019 PATLOBA PANDURANG JAYBAYE ...

Advocate for Applicants/State : Mr S.N. Morampalle Advocate for Respondent : Mr P.C. Mayure WITH 06 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12253 OF 2019 IN FAST/30256/2019 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

VERSUS

SHYAMSUNDAR DIGAMBAR AGLAVE ...

Advocate for Applicants/State : Mr S.N. Morampalle Advocate for Respondent : Mr P.C. Mayure 06 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12257 OF 2019 IN FAST/30236/2019 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

VERSUS

NARAYAN GANGADHAR KATE ...

Advocate for Applicants/State : Mr S.N. Morampalle Advocate for Respondent : Mr P.C. Mayure CORAM : SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.

DATE : 28th APRIL, 2022 PER COURT :

1.

These are the applications for condonation of delay moved by the applicants/State.

2.

Heard Mr S.N. Morampalle, learned AGP for the applicants/State and Mr P.C. Mayure, learned counsel for the respondents/claimants. 3.

Mr P.C. Mayure, learned counsel for the original claimants strongly opposed to condone the delay.

3 906-12255-2019 4.

Mr S.N. Morampalle, learned AGP for the State/appellant submitted that the delay is not intentional. The delay was resulted due to completing formalities and obtaining sanction from the competent authority. He therefore, urged to condone the delay.

5.

For the reasons stated in the applications for condonation of delay in para Nos. 5 to 7 and in the interest of justice, the delay needs to be condoned to decide the appeals on their own merits.

ORDER

(i) The applications for condonation of delay moved by the State are hereby allowed.

(ii) The Registry to make the scrutiny of the appeals and thereafter, those be numbered and placed before the Court for admission.

(iii) The civil applications are accordingly disposed of. ( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) mta