Rajendra Bayaji Hole v. Maharashtra Krushi Udyog Vikas Mahamandal Maryadit Through Managing Director And Others

ca 16371.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 924 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16371 OF 2022 IN WP/8718/2019 RAJENDRA BAYAJI HOLE

VERSUS

MAHARASHTRA KRUSHI UDYOG VIKAS MAHAMANDAL MARYADIT, MUMBAI AND OTHERS.

...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S J Salgar h/f Gaware Niteen V.

AGP for Respondents: Mr. S G Sangle Advocate for Respondent 1 : Mr Amit Savale ...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ. Dated: January 06, 2023 ...

PER COURT :- 1.

The applicant prays for leave to amend the petition in the light of the subsequent events.

2.

The learned Advocates representing the respondents oppose the civil application.

3.

Considering that subsequent events are sought to be brought on record and the respondents can fle additional affdavit-in-reply, if the affdavit-in-reply is not yet fled, the civil application is allowed. Amendment be carried out within two weeks from today and a freshly typed copy of the amended petition be fled aaa/-

ca 16371.22.odt on record within the same time frame. Copies be supplied to the learned Advocates for respondents. 4.

The respondents are at liberty to fle additional affdavit-in-reply within four weeks from today. 5.

Since it is reported that respondent no.3 has passed away, the applicant prays for leave to delete respondent no.3.

6.

Leave granted. Deletion be carried out forthwith. (SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) ...

aaa/-