Nayabrao Bhivsan Zanjal v. Aurangabad Municipal Corporation Through Its Chief Officer Aurangabad

909.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 WRIT PETITION NO. 2179 OF 2017 NAYABRAO BHIVSAN ZANJAL

VERSUS

AURANGABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER AURANGABAD ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mrs. Naseem R. Shaikh Addl.GP for Respondents:Mrs. M. A. Deshpande

CORAM

: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & K. L. WADANE, JJ.

DATE :

23rd February, 2017 ORDER:

1.

We have heard Mrs. Shaik, the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2.

The learned counsel submits that after the departmental enquiry, the petitioner was dismissed from service. Against the said order of dismissal, the petitioner has filed Writ petition No. 4885/2009. The same is admitted by this Court and is pending. The learned counsel submits that subsequently, the petitioner has been acquitted from the criminal trial and now the petitioner seeks pension. The same has been refused to the petitioner.

3.

Unless the order terminating the petitioner is set aside, the petitioner would not be entitled for the 1/2

909.odt prayer made in the present writ petition. The petitioner may agitate this aspect in Writ Petition No.4885/2009 which is pending and in which the order of termination is assailed, 4.

Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.

(K. L. WADANE, J.) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) JPC 2/2