Navnath Pandurang Anarase v. Bharat Ankush Anarase And Another

2024:BHC-AUG:25797 911(B)-Cri-Appln-4190-2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4190 OF 2024 IN APPLN/3957/2024 NAVNATH PANDURANG ANARASE

VERSUS

BHARAT ANKUSH ANARASE AND ANOTHER ....

Mr. M. D. Shinde, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. R. G. Hange, Advocate h/f Mr. Anirudh R. Hange, Advocate for the Respondent No.1 Mr. V. M. Jaware, APP for Respondent No.2 - State ....

CORAM : Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.

DATE : 18.10.2024 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard Mr. Shinde, the learned Advocate for the Applicant and Mr. Hange, the learned Advocate for the non Applicant No.1 and the learned APP for non applicant No.2. 2.

By the present Application, the applicant/informant prayed for permission to assist the prosecution to bring true facts of the case on record. The said application is not seriously contested by the learned Advocate for the applicant/accused. Therefore, in view of the ratio laid down in the case of Jagjeet

(( 2 )) 911(B)-Cri-Appln-4190-2024 Singh & Ors Vs. Ashish Mishra @ Monu & Anr, (2022) 9 SCC 321. The Application is allowed. The Applicant/informant is permitted to assist the prosecution.

[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] SMS