Ajay Vaijinath Bhange v. The State Of Maharashtra

902-BA.1673-23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1673 OF 2023 AJAY VAIJINATH BHANGE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Jadhav Satej S.

APP for Respondent-State : Mr. A. S. Shinde.

...

CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.

DATE :

18.01.2024 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for Respondent-State.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant states that the charges have been framed and witness summons have also been issued. However, the witnesses are not appearing in the Court. Apparently, this is not a change-in-circumstance and a ground to seek bail. Remedy is available in law, if the witnesses are not appearing in the Court. However, instead of exhausting the remedy available, the present bail application is filed. There is no substance in the application. Hence, the bail application stands dismissed.

(S. G. MEHARE, J.) ...

vmk/-