Bombay High CourtWP/10626/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Gangadhar Ramrao Maske And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2016-12-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde1 pages

{1} wp1062616.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10626 OF 2016 Gangadhar s/o Ramrao Maske & others Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.M.P.Tripathi, advocate for petitioners Mr.M.M.Nerlikar, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 to 4. Mr.A.T.Jadhavar, advocate for Respondent No.5. CORAM : R.M.BORDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 14th December, 2016 PER COURT:

In view of the decision of the Full Bench at Mumbai in the matter of Anant H. Ulhalkar & another Vs. Chief Election Commissioner & others (Writ Petition No.10748 of 2014, decided on 9th December, 2016), no interference is called for in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petition is devoid of substance. Writ Petition stands dismissed.

(SANGITRAO S. PATIL) (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE JUDGE adb/wp1062616