← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/14049/2021disposed off

Chandrakant Ambadas Gaikwad And Another v. Taluka Inspector Deputy Superintendent Of Land Record Washi And Others

2021-12-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Dige2 pages

.. 1 ..

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1020 WRIT PETITION NO.14049 OF 2021 CHANDRAKANT AMBADAS GAIKWAD AND ANOTHER .. Petitioners

VERSUS

TALUKA INSPECTOR DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF LAND RECORD WASHI AND OTHERS .. Respondents ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Ankush N. Nagargoje AGP for Respondents / State : Mr. S.G. Karlekar ...

CORAM

: S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND S. G. DIGE, JJ.

DATE : 14-12-2021 PER COURT :

1.

The names of the petitioners are deleted from the property card in the year 2008. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the similarly situated petitioners had filed Writ Petition bearing No.2562 of 2009. This Court under order dated 24-02-2011 directed the TILR to consider the matter afresh and decide the representation within six months, after hearing the concerned parties. Pursuant thereto the PTR cards are restored in the name of the petitioners, who had filed the writ petitions earlier. 2.

Subsequently, the petitioners had also filed the representation, Gajanan

.. 2 ..

but the cognizance is not taken by the authorities. 3.

The learned AGP accepts notice for all the respondents. 4.

In fact the petitioners appear to be sleeping over their rights and only in the year 2018 had moved the authorities. In normal course, we would have relegated the petitioner to file an appeal before the appropriate authority. It is only because the similarly situated petitioners had approached this Court and this Court had issued directions to consider their cases, we pass the following order.

ORDER

(i) In case, the application of the petitioner (Page no.166) Exh."N" Collectively is pending with the TILR and if the TILR is competent to decide it, then the same shall be decided on it's own merits, in accordance with law, after hearing the parties, preferably within six months.

5.

Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

( S. G. DIGE ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE Gajanan