Rajendra Trimbakraj Chhajed v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

{1} wp808213.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8082 OF 2013 Shivaji s/o Vithal Yellam Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.12 OF 2014 Narhari s/o Savaleram Adik & another Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.911 OF 2014 Dadasaheb s/o Appasaheb Yelam Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4587 OF 2014 Rajendra s/o Trimbakraj Chhajed Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.D.R.Jayabhar, advocate for the petitioner Mrs.A.V.Gondhalekar, Mr.S.G.Karlekar, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2.

{2} wp808213.odt CORAM : R.M.BORDE & P.R.BORA, JJ.

DATE : 14th September, 2015 PER COURT:

In the affidavit-in-reply, it is recorded that the petitioner has an alternate efficacious remedy provided under Sections 33 and 34 of the Maharashtra Agriculture Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961, read with clause 9.7 of the Government Resolution dated 02.02.2012. It also transpires that the Committee has already taken a decision, which has been confirmed by the Collector, Ahmednagar and said decision is being assailed in the instant petition.

In view of availability of alternate efficacious remedy for redressal of grievance raised by petitioners in instant petitions, keeping open an option to the petitioners to avail of said remedy, writ petitions stand disposed of.

P.R.BORA R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE adb/wp808213