Nandabai Bhimrao Misal v. The Union Of India Through The General Manager And Others

2025:BHC-AUG:35672-DB Writ Petition No.14983/2025 :: 1 ::

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.14983 OF 2025 Nandabai w/o Bhimrao Misal ... PETITIONER

VERSUS

The Union of India & ors.

... RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. K.D. Khade, Advocate for petitioner Mr. R.B. Bagul, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3 Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for respondents No.4 and 5 .......

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.

DATE : 12th DECEMBER, 2025 O R D E R :

Present petition has been filed for issuing directions to decide application dated 3/12/2024 and directions to respondents No.1 to 3 to provide alternative road from Palwan Chowk to Dhanwade Wasti road, in view of section 19 of the Indian Railways Act.

2.

Learned Advocate Mr. Bagul waives service for respondents No.1 to 3. Learned A.G.P. waives service for respondents No.4 and 5. Learned Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3, upon telephonic instructions, submits that, the representation dated 3/12/2024 is in fact addressed to respondent No.5. However,

Writ Petition No.14983/2025 :: 2 ::

copy of the same appears to have been given to respondents No.1 to 3. On the basis of the said copy, they would decide the representation. However, along with the said representation, documents have not been annexed.

3.

Learned Advocate for the petitioner disputes the fact that no documents were annexed with the representation. 4.

Be that as it may. Since the representation is pending, it will have to be decided and taken to its logical end. The petitioner would appear before the respondent No.3 on 24th December 2025 and submit all the documents. If at all the respondent No.3 is in need of more documents, then the respondent No.3 may communicate the same to the petitioner and compliance of the same be made within the reasonable period. Thereafter if the respondent No.3 has the authority to decide or simply to forward the same to respondent No.2 for decision, then it should be forwarded for the said decision, but ultimately the decision on the said representation be taken either by respondent No.2 or respondent No.3 by the end of February 2026. Writ Petition stands disposed of. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR) (SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI) JUDGE JUDGE fmp/-