Sarita Balajirao Birkale v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11386 OF 2018 SARITA BALAJIRAO BIRKALE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Jadhavar Pratap V.

AGP for Respondents: Mrs.G.L.Deshpande Adv.Mr.R.K.Ingole for Respondent no.4.

...

CORAM : R.M.BORDE & MANGESH S. PATIL,JJ.

DATE : 11/10/2018 PER COURT :- The tribe validation proposal tendered by the petitioner to the employer is pending with respondent no.2 scrutiny committee since 2013 and no decision has yet been arrived at. 2] It is informed by the learned AGP appearing for respondent no.2 that the matter is referred for report of the vigilance cell and after receipt of the report of vigilance cell, appropriate decision will be taken. It is further stated that the decision in respect of proposal would be taken as expeditiously as possible preferably within 3 months from today. The statement made is accepted.

3] The respondent no.2 scrutiny committee is directed to decide the proposal in respect of the validation of the tribe

certificate of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferably within 3 months from today and it is directed. 4] The respondent no.4 shall not take any adverse action against the petitioner on account of failure to submit validation certificate and appropriate decision in the issuance of adverse order by the respondent no.2 scrutiny committee. 5] With directions as above, Writ Petition is disposed of. (MANGESH S. PATIL,J.) (R.M.BORDE,J.) umg/