← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/11197/2024admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

The Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division Osmanabad v. Uddhav Shivram Ranmale And ORS

2025-03-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:7181 (1) 62-ca-11197-2024-delay.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11197 OF 2024 IN FAST/28234/2024 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION OSMANABAD

VERSUS

UDDHAV SHIVRAM RANMALE AND ORS ...

Mr. Nikhil Shripad Tekale, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Yash S. Pareek h/f Ms. Sakshi A. Kale, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

...

CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

DATED : 11th MARCH, 2025.

P.C.:- 1.

Heard learned Advocates appearing for respective parties. 2.

By this application, applicant seeks to condone delay of 543 days caused in filing Appeal.

3.

The learned Advocate appearing for respondent no.1 opposes application.

4.

Perused application. It appears that delay caused on account of administrative reasons. The applicant has not derived any advantage by making such delay. Hence, sufficient cause is made out to condone delay. Hence, following order:

ORDER

a.

Civil Application is allowed.

b.

Delay of 543 days caused in filing Appeal is hereby condoned.

(2) 62-ca-11197-2024-delay.odt c.

Appeal be registered subject to removal of office objection regarding Court Fees, if any.

(S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR) JUDGE Devendra/March-2025