Jagannath Vithal Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Osmanabad And Another

965-CA-16418-2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16418 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 29439 OF 2022 WITH CA/16417/2022 IN FAST/29475/2022 JAGANNATH VITHAL JADHAV

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. P.H. Sukale - Advocate for Applicant Ms. G.L. Deshpande - AGP for Respondent No.1, State ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 14th March, 2023 PER COURT :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods mentioned in these applications, which appear to be caused due to their poor fnancial condition. 3.

The learned A.G.P. strongly opposed the application on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay periods. The acquiring body though 1/2

965-CA-16418-2022 served, but remained absent.

4.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay periods mentioned in these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay.

5.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

6.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. [ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE Pooja K.

2/2