The State Of Maharashtra v. Annarao Sadashiv Patil

(1) C. A. Nos. 16011 & 16013 of 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16011 OF 2010 IN FAST/33460/2010 WITH CA/16013/2010 IN FAST/33398/2010 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

VERSUS

ANNARAO SADASHIV PATIL .........................

Advocate for Applicant : Shri N.B. Patil, Asst. Govt. Pleader Advocate for Non-applicant : Shri Laxmikant C. Patil ..........................

CORAM : A.M. BADAR, J.

DATE : 7TH DECEMBER 2015 PER COURT :

1.

These are applications for condonation of delay of 835 days caused in filing appeals under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, by the State.

2.

Heard the learned Assistant Government for the applicant - State and the learned Counsel appearing for the non-applicant - original claimant. The learned Counsel appearing for the non-applicant submits that the delay is not properly explained.

3.

Perusal of the applications shows that the delay has occasioned

(2) C. A. Nos. 16011 & 16013 of 2010 as conscious decision was required to be taken at various levels. Averments made in the applications are not controverted by filing counter affidavit. 4.

Hence, the for the stated reasons Applications are allowed. Delay in filing appeals is condoned. First Appeals be registered. The Civil Application is accordingly disposed of.

( A.M. BADAR ) JUDGE ................................

puranik / CA16011.10etc