← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/11558/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Syed Jalil Syed Jamal v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2016-11-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde3 pages

{1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.11546 OF 2016 Vijay Asaram Salve Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents WITH WRIT PETITIOIN NO.11547 OF 2016 Smt. Hausabaiw/o Uttam Jadhav Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents WITH WRIT PETITIOIN NO.11548 OF 2016 Anil S/o Abbarao Bidkar Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents WITH WRIT PETITIOIN NO.11557 OF 2016 Sanjay S/o Sandu Surase Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents WITH WRIT PETITIOIN NO.11558 OF 2016 Syed Jalil S/o Syed Jamal Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents

{2} WITH WRIT PETITIOIN NO.11559 OF 2016 Kailash S/o Bhaskar Raut Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents Mr.P.A. Kulkarni advocate for the petitioners Mr.S.B. Joshi, Mr. S.J. Salgare, Mr. K.D. Mundhe, Mr. M.M. Nerlikar, Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, Mr. A.V. Deshmukh AGPs for Respondents _______________ CORAM : R.M. BORDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ (Date : 23rd November, 2016.) PER COURT :- Original Application No.782 of 2004 was presented by the petitioners before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, raising same issue, which has been raised in the instant petitions. The Tribunal while disposing of the Original Application observed:- " G) Ad-hoc appointees/daily wagers shall be allowed to participate in the competitive selection process by giving them the benefit of relxation in upper age limit to the extent of service rendered by them as adh-hoc/daily wage or contractual employees."

In view of determination of the issue by the tribunal another Original Applications presented by the petitioners being O.A.

{3} No.419/2014 and other companion Original Applications have been disposed of, as withdrawn, by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal on 30.8.2016.

In view of finality attached to the orders in Original Application No.782/2004 & other applications, the grievance raised by the petitioners in the instant petitions again, does not deserve consideration. The petitions are devoid of substance and hence stand disposed of.

(SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J) (R.M.BORDE, J) vbd