← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/13082/2017admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Venkatesh Narsayya Mamaiwar (Reddy) And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2017-09-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre2 pages

32515.17cast (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO.32515 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8905 OF 2014 Venkatesh s/o Narsayya Mamaiwar (Reddy), Age: 57 years, Occ:Business, R/o. Shyadrinagar, Nanded, Tq. & Dist. Nanded & anr ..APPLICANTS

VERSUS

State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & ors ..RESPONDENTS Mr H.I. Pathan, Advocate for applicant;

Mr C.V. Dharurkar, A.G.P. for respondent/State CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 27th SEPTEMBER, 2017 ORAL ORDER :

Writ Petition No.8905 of 2014 came to be dismissed for non removal of office objections vide order dated 23rd November, 2016 and further order of the Assistant Registrar on 17th December, 2016. 2.

Today, deficit court fee stamp of Rs.250/- is paid.

32515.17cast (2) 3.

Present civil application is moved by the applicants-original petitioners for restoration of Writ Petition No.8905 of 2014 and for condonation of delay.

4.

Since the prayer is not opposed for condonation of delay, same stands allowed.

5.

Civil Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and (C).

6.

As the petition is restored, it will be appropriate to issue notice to the respondents, returnable in 12 weeks. In addition to court process, respondents be served through R.P.A.D. 7.

Learned A.G.P. waives service of notice for respondent No.1.

( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) Tupe