Chautra Rustum Shinde v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

(1) 36-wp-10604-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 36 WRIT PETITION NO.10604 OF 2016 CHAUTRA RUSTUM SHINDE ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. Vishant P. Kadam, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. P. Tiwari, AGP for Respondent-State.

Mr. Mahesh P. Kale, Advocate for the Respondent No.5.

...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.

DATED : 19th DECEMBER, 2018.

PER COURT:- 1.

Heard Mr. Kadam, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Kale, learned counsel for respondent no.5 and learned A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 to 4.

2.

The prayer Clause (B) does not survive as the claim is already decided by the Committee. 3.

In view of that, writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

(R. G. AVACHAT) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/December-18