Sau Sangeeta W/O Leelakant Ramteke And Another v. Leelakant S/O Haribhau Ramteke And Another

15 appln.6380.14.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6380 OF 2014 IN REVNST/263/2014 SAU. SANGEETA W/O LEELAKANT RAMTEKE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

LEELAKANT S/O HARIBHAU RAMTEKE AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. D. S. Kore.

Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Kachru A. Ingle. APP for Respondent No.2 : Mr. K. S. Patil.

...

CORAM :

INDIRA K. JAIN, J.

DATE :

11th January, 2016.

P.C.:

.

Applicant No.1 is wife and Applicant No.2 is son of Respondent No.1. Applicants filed an application for maintenance before the Family Court, Aurangabad. The learned Judge of Family Court awarded maintenance at the rate of Rs.1,000/- per month each to Applicants. Applicants have challenged the said order in Criminal Revision Application (stamp) No.263 of 2014.

Since 100 days delay has been caused in filing criminal revision present application is filed for condonation of delay. Heard Mr. D. S. Kore, learned counsel for Applicants and Mr.K.A. Ingle, learned counsel for Respondent No.1.

15 appln.6380.14.odt Perused the reasons assigned in the application. In view of the nature of dispute between the parties and the reasons assigned for delay, Criminal Application No.6380 of 2014 is allowed. Delay as prayed is condoned.

No order to costs.

[ INDIRA K. JAIN, J. ] ndm