Jitendra Kanhyalal Batheja v. Brijlal Kanhyalal Batheja

11683.14wp -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11683 OF 2015 Jitendra Kanhyalal Batheja

...Petitioner

versus Brijlal Kanhyalal Batheja

...Respondent

.....

Mr. D.K. Kulkarni, Advocate for petitioner Mr. B.R. Kedar, Advocate for respondent .....

CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 16th NOVEMBER, 2015 ORAL ORDER :

Mr.

Kedar, learned Counsel for the respondent/defendant, upon instructions, makes statement that his client-original defendant shall not crate any third party interest in the suit property till decision of the suit. The statement is accepted. 2.

In view of above statement, the writ petition no more survives, same stands disposed of.

3.

It is clarified that the petitioner herein will be at liberty to mortgage the said property. The defendant will be at liberty to take appropriate steps as per law in carrying out corrections in the mutation entry.

[ N.W. SAMBRE, J. ] Tupe/16.11.15