Executive Engineer, Medium Project Division, Jalgaon v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others
-:(1):- FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's orders.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15537 OF 2015 IN FAST/31906/2015 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION, JALGAON
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15540 OF 2015 IN FAST/31926/2015 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION, JALGAON
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15542 OF 2015 IN FAST/31900/2015 WITH CA/15544/2015 IN FAST/32125/2015 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION, JALGAON
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15559 OF 2015 IN FAST/31936/2015 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, UPPER TAPI PROJECT, HATNOOR-3,
-:(2):- JALGAON
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15561 OF 2015 IN FAST/31933/2015 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION, JALGAON
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15563 OF 2015 IN FAST/31930/2015 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION, JALGAON
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15571 OF 2015 IN FAST/31824/2015 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, HIVRA MEDIUM PROJECT, JALGAON
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS *** Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S. D. Shelke .
AGP for Respondent / State : Ms. R. P. Gaur.
@@@ CORAM: T. V. NALAWADE, J.
DATED:
24th FEBRUARY, 2016.
-:(3):- PER COURT:
1.
Heard learned counsel for the acquiring body. Most of the Respondents are served, though by fixing notice on the doors of their residential places. It appears that in one matter the Panchanama is not made when the notice was fixed on the door of the residential place. They are from same family and they are male persons. 2.
In view of the contents of the applications and the submissions made that some time was consumed for collecting certified copies, some time was consumed for processing the matters and some time was consumed for getting sanctions at various levels, this Court holds that sufficient cause is shown.
3.
In the result, all the applications are allowed. Delay condoned.
[T. V. NALAWADE, J.] Dt.24/02/2016.
ans/15537