Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Divn Latur Under Gmidc Aurangabad v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS
2025:BHC-AUG:21247 1 32-CA 1840-2025+.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1840 OF 2012 IN FAST/3224/2011 Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Latur under Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation, Aurangabad .. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra Through the Collector, Latur and another .. Respondents Mr. B. R. Surwase, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent/State.
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1838 OF 2012 IN FAST/3174/2011 Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Latur under Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation, Aurangabad .. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra Through the Collector, Latur and another .. Respondents Mr. B. R. Surwase, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent/State.
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1842 OF 2012 IN FAST/3200/2011
2 32-CA 1840-2025+.odt Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Latur under Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation, Aurangabad .. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra Through the Collector, Latur and another .. Respondents Mr. B. R. Surwase, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent/State.
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1841 OF 2012 IN FAST/3199/2011 Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Latur under Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation, Aurangabad .. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra Through the Collector, Latur and another .. Respondents Mr. B. R. Surwase, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent/State.
CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J.
DATE : 06th AUGUST, 2025.
PER COURT :- .
These applications are filed by the acquiring body for intervention. The State Government has already filed appeals on behalf of State as well as the acquiring body i.e. the applicants in
3 32-CA 1840-2025+.odt these applications. There cannot be two advocates in the same appeal for the appellants. The acquiring body is already a party. 2.
For this reason, nothing survives in the applications. The civil applications stand dismissed.
3.
It is made clear that, the learned advocate for the acquiring body is at liberty to address the Court in the first appeals. 4.
The civil applications stand disposed of.
( KISHORE C. SANT, J. ) P.S.B.