The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector Beed And ANR v. Datta Bhaskar Karvile

2025:BHC-AUG:6423 55-CA.12187.2024.odt IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BENCH AT AURANGABAD 55 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12187 OF 2024 IN FAST/28680/2024 The State of Maharashtra, Through Collector Beed & Anr.

....Applicants

Versus

Datta Bhaskar Karvile ....Respondent .....

Mr. D. B. Bhange, AGP, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. Sanket A. Jadhav h/f. Ms. Anjali B. Dube, Advocate for Respondent. .....

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12188 OF 2024 IN FAST/28680/2024 The State of Maharashtra, Through Collector Beed & Anr.

....Applicants

Versus

Datta Bhaskar Karvile ....Respondent .....

Mr. D. B. Bhange, AGP, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. Sanket A. Jadhav h/f. Ms. Anjali B. Dube, Advocate for Respondent. .....

.....

CORAM :

S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

DATED : 3rd MARCH 2025 P.C.:- CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12187 OF 2024:- 1.

Heard Mr. Bhange, learned AGP for Applicants-State. 2.

Applicants seeks to condone the delay of 471 days caused in filing the appeal against impugned judgment and award dated 15th Tauseef

55-CA.12187.2024.odt February 2023 in L.A.R. No.233 of 2019. Perused the reasons as mentioned in the application. Delay is occasioned on account of administrative reasons. Applicants have not derived any advantage by making this delay.

3.

In that view of the matter, application is allowed. The delay of 471 days caused in filing the appeal is condoned. Appeal be registered, subject to removal of office objections. (S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.) Tauseef