Charansing @ Rahul S/O. Suratsing Pardeshi And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1 Cri.Apln 2975-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 938 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2975 OF 2018 CHARANSING @ RAHUL S/O. SURATSING PARDESHI AND ANR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr.Ambetkar Arvind G. APP for Respondent-State: Mr. R. V. Dasalkar. Advocate for respondent No.2 :Mr. P. R. Katneshwarkar. ...

...

CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE & SMT.VIBHA KANKANWADI. JJ.

DATE : 16-10-2018.

JUDGMENT : (Per COURT ) 1.

Notice for final disposal waived by learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for State - respondent No.1 and also waived by Mr. P. R. Katneshwarkar for respondent No.2. Heard both the sides for final disposal.

2.

During arguments learned counsel for the applicants and respondent No.2 submitted that, they have settled the dispute and the parties have performed marriage. Affidavit of first informant is already filed. On the instructions given by this Court, affidavit of girl is also filed to show that she has completed 18 years of age. She has also informed that, she has married with the main accused. On the basis of information given by her guardian the crime was registered for the offence punishable under Section 363, 365 read

2 Cri.Apln 2975-2018 with 34 of Indian Penal Code.

3.

In view of the aforesaid circumstances, this Court hold that relief needs to be granted. In the result application is allowed. Relief is granted in terms of prayer Clause 'B'. Rule made absolute in those terms.

(SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI) (T. V. NALAWADE) JUDGE JUDGE vjg/-.