Bhujangrao Ramrao Kanshe Through Lrs. Parmeshwar Bhujangrao Kanshe And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector At Jalna And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 967 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16465 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 28662 OF 2022 PANDURANG UTTAM SOLANKE AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR PARBHANI AND OTHERS AND 968 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 299 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 28677 OF 2022 WITH CA/300/2023 IN FAST/29345/2022 VENKATI S/O RAMBHAU DHUMAL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR PARBHANI AND OTHERS AND 969 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 305 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 28842 OF 2022 WITH CA/304/2023 IN FAST/29328/2022 WITH CA/303/2023 IN FAST/29331/2022 MADHAVRAO BAPURAO DOIEPHODE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR AT PARBHANI AND OTHERS AND 970 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 411 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 29898 OF 2022 WITH CA/412/2023 IN FAST/29900/2022 SHIRAJUDDIN ABDUL WAHED DESHMUKH
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE 1/3
COLLECTOR JALNA AND OTHERS AND 971 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 417 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 29921 OF 2022 ARJUN PRALHADRAO CHAVAL AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR PARBHANI AND 972 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 418 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 29932 OF 2022 WITH CA/420/2023 IN FAST/30519/2022 WITH CA/419/2023 IN FAST/30527/2022 BHUJANGRAO RAMRAO KANSHE THROUGH LRS.
PARMESHWAR BHUJANGRAO KANSHE AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR AT JALNA AND OTHERS ...
Mr. V.D. Bhise - Advocate for Applicants Ms. G.L. Deshpande, Mr. S.S. Dande - AGP's for Respondent Nos.1 and 3, State (in respective applications) Mr.S.C. Arora - Advocate for Respondent No.2, Acquiring Body (in respective applications) ....
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATE : 14th March, 2023 PER COURT :
1.
Heard rival submissions.
2.
The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods mentioned in these applications, which appear 2/3
to be caused due to their poor financial condition. 3.
The learned A.G.P. as well as the learned counsel for the acquiring body strongly opposed the application on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay periods.
4.
However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay periods mentioned in these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay.
5.
The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.
6.
The Civil Applications are accordingly disposed of. [ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE Pooja K.
3/3