← Library
Bombay High CourtRA/258/2017disposed offdismissed for default

Akhtarunnisa Begum Abdul Rashid And Others v. Rizwana Begum Sharif Pathan And Others

2017-11-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi2 pages

(Order) (1) Review Appln. No. 00258 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

Review Application No. 00258 of 2017 (In Writ Petition No. 11504 of 2017) District : Beed Akhtarunnisa Begum w/o. Abdul Rashid, Age : 71 years, Occupation : Household, R/o. Bhaldarpura, Beed, Taluka & District Beed, & 07 others.

.. Applicants.

versus Rizwana Begum w/o. Sharif Pathan, Age : 46 years, Occupation : Household, .. Non-applicants.

R/o. Chun Galli, Beed, (Nos.01 to 06 - District Beed, Original writ & 07 others.

petitioners) ...........

Mr. S.S. Kazi, Advocate, holding for Ms. Fatema S. Kazi, Advocate, for applicants. Mr. K.J. Suryawanshi, Advocate, for non-applicant nos.01 to 06.

Mr. S.B. Deshpande, Asst. Solicitor General of India, for non-applicant no.07.

Mr. S.P. Sonpawale, Asst. Government Pleader, for non-applicant no.08.

...........

CORAM : R.M. BORDE & SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.

DATE : 15TH NOVEMBER 2017

(Order) (2) Review Appln. No. 00258 of 2017 ORAL ORDER :

01.

There is no reason to cause interference in the order passed while disposing of Writ Petition No. 11504 of 2017. The review application is based on mere apprehension and, as such, does not deserve to be considered.

02.

The review application, as such, stands rejected.

( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi ) ( R.M. Borde ) JUDGE JUDGE ...........

puranik / RA258.17