Ranjana Ashruba Chavan @ Ranjana Sadashiv Ambad v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

17 WRIT PETITION NO. 1757 OF 2012 RANJANA ASHRUBA CHAVAN @ RANJANA SADASHIV AMBAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. T.G. Gaikwad AGP for Respondents:Mr. S.B. Yawalkar ...

CORAM : R. M. BORDE & VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.

Date: December 18, 2017 ...

PER COURT :- The petitioner is praying for issuance of directions for consideration of her name for the appointment on the post of Anganwadi Karyakarti, at village Ladegaon, Tq. Kaij, District: Beed, in the light of the Government Resolution dated 16.6.2001. The advertisement for filling in the vacancies was issued in the year 2011. In the advertisement, the upper age limit prescribed was 35 years, whereas the petitioner was aged 44 years at the time of tendering an application for appointment.

It is the contention of the respondents that, the policy prescribed under the Government Resolution dated 16.6.2001 is not applicable in cases of appointments under the scheme. However, said policy is applicable only in respect of regular employment. Apart from this aspect, it cannot be controverted that, the process of selection initiated in the year 2001 was over long back and the selected candidates must have been appointed. After passage of six years from the date of issuance of advertisement and completion of process of selection, no relief, as claimed by the petitioner, in the instant petition, can be granted.

The writ petition is devoid of any substance and hence stands disposed of.

( VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. ) vbd