← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10776/2016disposed off

Sanjay Bhaidas Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2022-08-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 WRIT PETITION NO.10776 OF 2016 SANJAY BHAIDAS PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Patil Prakashsing B. AGP for Respondents-State : Mr. P. S. Patil Advocate for Respondent Nos.5 and 6 : Mr. G. S. Rane Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 : Mr. S. R. Dheple ...

WITH 902 WRIT PETITION NO.3673 OF 2018 WITH CA/3526/2021 IN WP/3673/2018 SANJAY BHAIDAS PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Patil Prakashsing B. AGP for Respondents-State: Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 and 4 : Mr. G. S. Rane ...

WITH 903 WRIT PETITION NO.4312 OF 2018 SANJAYH BHAIDAS PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Patil Prakashsing B. AGP for Respondents-State : Mr. S. K. Tambe Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 : Mr. S. R. Dheple ...

WP 10776-2016 CORAM :

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND ARUN R. PEDNEKER, JJ.

DATE :

25th August, 2022 PER COURT :

1.

The learned Advocate for the petitioner in all these three matters, places on record a copy of the communication received by him along with a compilation of eight pages. The same is marked as 'X' collectively, for identifcation.

2.

Considering the compilation of documents 'X', the learned Advocate submits that the petitioner has instructed him to withdraw these petitions.

3.

The learned Advocate for the respondents do not oppose. 4.

In view of the above, these petitions are disposed off as withdrawn.

( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) vjg/-.