Bhausing Sitaram Gunjal v. Shantaram Panditrao Jagdale

ca2888-12 drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2888 OF 2012 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO.32900 OF 2011 Bhausing Sitaram Gunjal APPLICANT

VERSUS

Shantaram Panditrao Jagdale RESPONDENT .......

Mr. V. R. Langhe, Advocate for the applicant Mr. P. F. Patni, Advocate for the respondent .......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] DATE : 18 th NOVEMBER, 2016 ORDER :

1.

Learned advocate for the applicants points out that delay is sought to be accounted for under the reasons as are appearing in civil application.

2.

Learned advocate for the respondent is not in a position to dispute veracity of the reasons. In the facts and circumstances, it would be expedient to condone the delay occurred in filing second appeal.

3.

In view of aforesaid, civil application stands granted in terms of prayer clause "B" and is disposed of. [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] drp/ca2888-12