Pralhad Ganpati Narhare v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

924 CA NO.10469 OF 2025+.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10469 OF 2025 IN X-OBJST/32038/2018 Angad Ganpati Narhare

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Others ...

Mr. Suraj V. Gundre, Advocate for Applicant Mr. S. B. Jadhav, AGP for Respondents/State AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10470 OF 2025 IN X-OBJST/32041/2018 Pralhad Ganpati Narhare

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Others ...

Mr. Suraj V. Gundre, Advocate for Applicant Mr. S. B. Jadhav, AGP for Respondents/State ....

CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : 14.11.2025 PER COURT :- APPLICATIONS FOR DELAY 1.

Heard.

2.

These are the applications for condonation of 1527 days delay caused in filing the X-Objections.

3.

The learned AGP for the State strongly opposes the applications and submits that sufficient grounds are not stated in the applications to condone the delay and prays to reject the applications.

(( 2 )) 924 CA NO.10469 OF 2025+ 4.

Perused the applications. For the reasons stated therein, the applications deserve to be allowed in the interest of justice as the delay is neither deliberate nor intentional. Hence the following order: ::ORDER::

a.

Civil Applications are allowed.

b.

The delay of 1527 days caused in filing the X-Objections is condoned subject to condition that in case the amount of compensation is enhanced, the claimants shall not be entitled for the amount of interest for the delayed period.

c.

Civil Applications stand disposed of.

[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] HRJadhav