Shaikh Rauf Shaikh Ismail v. Santosh Ramdas Mhaske
(1) 945 Appln-4307.2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 945 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4307 OF 2024 IN ALPST/11613/2024 SHAIKH RAUF SHAIKH ISMAIL
VERSUS
SANTOSH RAMDAS MHASKE AND 946 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4309 OF 2024 IN ALPST/11621/2024 SHAIKH RAUF SHAIKH ISMAIL
VERSUS
SANTOSH RAMDAS MHASKE ...
Mr. Syed Moisali Amjedali, Advocate for the applicant. ...
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATED :
26 FEBRUARY 2025.
ORDER:- 1.
Heard learned Counsel for the applicant. The respondent, despite service, remained absent. 2.
The applications are for condonation of delay periods mentioned therein in filing application for leave to appeal. There is no oppose to the application and hence the same are allowed in terms of their prayer clauses (B) and disposed of. 3.
ALPs be registered accordingly.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) VD_Dhirde