Sunita Sambhaji Kudale v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1002-ca-467-14.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1002 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.467 OF 2014 IN FAST/32809/2013 SUNITA SAMBHAJI KUDALE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AD OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Murge Estling S AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. R.B. Bagul Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. S.C. Arora ...

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

DATE : 2nd AUGUST, 2019.

ORDER :

.

Present application has been filed by the original claimant for getting the delay of 296 days condoned in filing first appeal. The original claimant intends to challenge the judgment and award passed by the learned reference Court. Learned Advocate representing the respondents have strong objection on the ground that the delay has not been properly explained. 02.

Taking into consideration the fact that the claimant is a farmer, whose land has been acquired and since she is coming from rural area, delay stands condoned.

03.

Civil Application stands allowed and disposed of accordingly.

1002-ca-467-14.doc 04.

It is clarified that the applicant will not be entitled to get interest of 296 days in case of success in the appeal. 05.

Registry to verify and register the first appeal and place it for further consideration on 17.10.2019. ( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J. ) Shubham/