Dnyaneshwar S/O Baburao Tupe And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Collector, Aurangabad And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 952 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3938 OF 2022 IN FAST/32235/2021 DNYANESHWAR S/O BABURAO TUPE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

DNYANESHWAR S/O BABURAO TUPE AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Sonawane Tejas Charudatta AGP for Respondents - State : Mr. S. N. Kendre Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr.Patil Shamsunder B. ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 12.10.2022 PER COURT :

Heard rival submissions. The applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 2430 days which appears to be caused due to their financial crisis. The learned AGP as well as learned counsel for acquiring body strongly opposed the application on the ground that the delay is not properly explained.

2.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants delay of 2430 days stands condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid period of delay. 3.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

4.

Application is accordingly disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-