Ganpat Ramdas Nirval v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

1 956 FA 886-17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 956 FIRST APPEAL NO.886 OF 2017 GANPAT RAMDAS NIRVAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A. B. Kale AGP for Respondents: Mr. Suresh Mundhe ....

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 24/02/2023.

P. C. :

1.

The contesting parties namely the appellant and respondent No.3 acquiring body have settled the matter and also entered into compromise terms, which are tendered across the bar by the learned counsel. The same are taken on record and marked as "X" for identifcation.

2.

I personally verifed the contents of the aforesaid compromise terms through parties and they admitted the same being truly recorded. As such, those consent terms are accepted. The award be drawn in view of those consent terms. The appeal stands disposed of accordingly.

3.

Court fee be refunded as per rule.

4.

The acquiring body shall deposit the amount of compensation as prayed in the compromise terms and on such deposit, the

2 956 FA 886-17 appellant - claimant is permitted to withdraw the same alongwith accrued interest thereon.

5.

Pending civil application, if any, is also disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-