Hindustan Composite Ltd. Through Its Authorized Representative Vijay Jain v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 4 WRIT PETITION NO. 2198 OF 2015 HINDUSTAN COMPOSITE LTD. THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE VIJAY JAIN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Ladda S. S Mr. PS Patil, AGP for Respondents ...

CORAM : R. M. BORDE & P.R. BORA, JJ.

Dated: October 12, 2015 ...

PER COURT :- 1) Heard. In view of availability of appellate remedy under Section 32-B of the Maharashtra Stamps Act, no interference is called for in the writ petition. Keeping the option of the petitioner to avail of the alternate remedy, available in law, open, the writ petition is disposed of.

2) If the petitioner tenders an appeal before the Appropriate Authority, the concerned authority may deal with it in accordance with law and decide the same expeditiously. 3) With the directions, as above, the writ petition is disposed of.

( P.R. BORA, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. ) ...

BDV