← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/13829/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Suresh Venkatrao Sonwane v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2018-12-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice K. K. Sonawane3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 950 WRIT PETITION NO.13829 OF 2018 Suresh s/o.Venkatrao Sonwane, Age: 65 years, Occu.Agril.

R/o. Shyamnagar, Ambejogai Road, Latur, Tq. & Dist. Latur.

.. PETITIONER

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.

2.

The Latur City Municipal Corporation, Latur Through its Commissioner.

3.

The Assistant Director, Town Planning, Municipal Corporation, Latur, Dist. Latur.

4.

Bhagiratibai w/o. Laxman Kale, Age: Major, Occu.Household, R/o. Shyamnagar, Ambejogai Road, Latur, Tq. & Dist. Latur.

..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr.S.S.Manale, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.A.B.Chate, AGP for Respondent - State ...

CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & K.K.SONAWANE,JJ.

DATE : 12.12.2018

ORDER:

1] Heard. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, respondent nos.2 and 3 are empowered to visit the site, and find out whether the construction, which is being undertaken by respondent no.4, is in accordance with the sanction plan by respondent nos.2 and 3. Therefore, he submits that, without entering upon the contentions raised on merits, this Court may direct respondent nos.2 and 3 to decide the pending applications / representations dated 15th June, 2018 and 28th June, 2018, by the petitioners addressed to respondent nos.2 and 3.

2] Since there is an innocuous prayer to direct respondent nos.2 and 3 to decide the applications/representations filed by the petitioner; without entering upon the merits of the contentions raised in this Petition or

in the said applications/representations, we direct respondent nos.2 and 3 to decide the pending applications/representations of the petitioner, if already not decided, in accordance with law and relevant procedure, as expeditiously as possible, however, within six weeks from today, on its own merits.

3] With the above observations, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

4] Parties to act upon authenticated copy of this order.

[K.K.SONAWANE] [S.S.SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC