Sarubai W/O Sahebrao Chavan v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Collector, Aurangabad And ORS

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 939 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13545 OF 2021 IN FAST/26907/2021 TUKHARAM SAKHARAM CHAVAN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD AND OTHERS AND 940 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13547 OF 2021 IN FAST/32385/2021 SARUBAI W/O SAHEBRAO CHAVAN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD AND OTHERS AND 941 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13548 OF 2021 IN FAST/32406/2021 BHAUSAHEB S/O SAHEBRAO CHAVAN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS AND 942 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13549 OF 2021 IN FAST/32614/2021 MADAN UTTAMRAO CHAVAN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS AND 943 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13550 OF 2021 IN FAST/32618/2021 WITH CA/13551/2021 IN FAST/33103/2021 SHRIPATI S/O RAOSAHEB CHAVAN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD AND OTHERS AND

(2) 944 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13552 OF 2021 IN FAST/32379/2021 SAGARBAI W/O BHAUSAHEB CHAVAN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD AND OTHERS AND 945 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13553 OF 2021 IN FAST/32390/2021 RAJU S/O SHANKAR UNMUKHE (DIED) THROUGH LRS SOMNATH AND ORS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD AND OTHERS AND 946 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13555 OF 2021 IN FAST/32387/2021 PRABHAKAR S/O SAHEBRAO CHAVAN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS ...

Mr. K.B. Jadhav, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. S.R. Yadav-Lonikar, Mr. A.A. Jagatkar and Mr. P.N. Kutti, AGPs for respondent - State in respective matters. Mrs. S.G. Bhalerao, Mr. Anand Chaware and Mrs. Chaitali Kutti and Mr. Virendra Tuwar, Advocate holding for Mrs. Sunita Shelka, Advocates for the Acquiring Body in respective matters.

...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

27.09.2022.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard the rival submissions. All these applications are fled by respective applicants - claimants for condonation

(3) of different delay periods as mentioned in those applications. The delay appears to be caused due to poor fnancial condition of the applicants. Learned A.G.P. as well as concerned learned Counsel for the Acquiring Body strongly opposed the applications on the ground that delay is not properly explained. However, considering the statutory right of the applicants the respective delay periods as mentioned in all these applications are hereby condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay periods.

2.

The respective appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

3.

All the civil applications stand disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde