Bombay High CourtWP/931/2013disposed offdismissed for default
Laxman Keshav Vaditke v. The State Of Mah And ORS
2016-01-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar1 pages
1 wp 931.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 931 OF 2013 Laxman Keshav Vaditke .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Hajare, Advocate h/f Shri Ajeet B. Kale, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Shri V. D. Rakh, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND A. M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 04TH JANUARY, 2016.
PER COURT :
.
The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits that, with the passage of time the purpose of the writ petition does not survive.
2.
The writ petition as such is disposed of. No costs. [ A. M. BADAR, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Jan. 16