Vijay Shankar Sable v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2025:BHC-AUG:31761 *1* 922apeal811a751o25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 811 OF 2025 SARTHAK VIJAY ALIAS VIJAYKUMAR SABLE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Shri Nilesh S. Ghanekar, Advocate h/f Shri Padaswan Rohit Devidas, Advocate for the Appellants.

Ms. Uma S. Bhosle, APP for the Respondents/State. Shri Shekade Shashikant E., Advocate for Respondent No.3. ...

AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 751 OF 2025 VIJAY SHANKAR SABLE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Shri Nilesh S. Ghanekar, Advocate h/f Shri Padaswan Rohit Devidas, Advocate for the Appellant.

Ms. Uma S. Bhosle, APP for the Respondent/State. Shri Shekade Shashikant E., Advocate for Respondent No.2. ...

CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.

DATE : 19 November 2025 P. C. :- 1.

Heard.

2.

At the outset, learned advocate Shri Ghanekar appearing on behalf of the appellants submits that appellant No.1

*2* 922apeal811a751o25 (Sarthak Sable) in Criminal Appeal No.811/2025 has already been arrested on 03.11.2025. He, therefore, submits that the appeal to his extent has become infructuous.

3.

In view of the above statement, Criminal Appeal No.811/2025 to the extent of appellant No.1 (Sarthak Sable) is disposed of.

4.

As far as other appellants in both these appeals are concerned, after hearing learned advocate for the appellants for some time, when this Court has shown its disinclination to entertain these appeals, learned advocate for the appellants, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the appeals. However, insofar as the appellant in Criminal Appeal No.751/2025 is concerned, learned advocate seeks liberty to file an application for regular bail after filing of the charge-sheet. 5.

Both Criminal Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty is granted to the appellant in Criminal Appeal No.751/2025 to file an application for regular bail after filing of the charge-sheet.

kps ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. )